Pottstown Public Safety

A Decade of Data: 2015–2025
Pottstown Police Department  |  UCR Crime Statistics  |  July 2026
Data-driven analysis prepared for Borough Council

The Headlines

10 years of Pottstown public safety data in 8 numbers
Front-Porch Summary

Over the past decade, Part I crime has fallen 30.5%, burglaries have hit a 30-year low, and total crimes are at their lowest point on record. At the same time, calls for service have risen 21.2%. Crime fell 30.5% while calls rose 21.2% — these two numbers moved in opposite directions over the same period.

Pottstown is safer than it has been in over 30 years. Serious crime is down 30.5% since 2015. Total crimes (Part I and Part II combined) hit their lowest recorded level at 2,979 in 2025. Burglary is at a 30-year low. At the same time, demand on the police department increased 21.2%. The department responded to 29,220 calls for service while managing that increase with the same staffing level. 2026 is on pace for the second-lowest Part I total ever recorded.
-30.5%
Serious Crime (Part I)
1,543 (2015) to 1,072 (2025)
Near historic low
1,072
Part I Crimes (2025)
Near historic low
2026 on pace for ~1,013
-55.9%
Burglaries
118 (2015) to 52 (2025)
30-year low
-32.8%
Assaults
375 (2015) to 252 (2025)
+21.2%
Calls for Service
24,118 (2015) to 29,220 (2025)
+5,102 calls over the decade
46
Sworn Officers
Maintained across the decade
89.8%
Community Service Calls
of 2025 calls classified non-crime after response
-23.8%
Total Crimes (I+II)
3,909 (2015) to 2,979 (2025)
Lowest on record
Crime is down 30.5%.  Demand is up 21.2%.  29,220 calls responded to.  Full transparency on costs.

What Your Police Do Every Day

The borough's only 24/7, go-anywhere, refuse-no-one service. Here is what that looks like in the data.

What Your Police Actually Do

29,220 calls in 2025 — up 21.2% from 2015
Front-Porch Summary
Calls for service rose 21.2% over the decade (24,118 to 29,220). The call categories that grew include welfare checks, noise concerns, suspicious activity, and situations classified as non-crime after response. In 2025, 26,241 of those 29,220 calls (89.8%) were classified as non-crime after officer response — medical emergencies, welfare checks, 911 hangups, building checks, accident investigations, and domestic disputes. The police department is the borough's only 24/7 service that goes anywhere and refuses no one. 911 and the police non-emergency line are currently the only channels available for non-emergency needs.
89.8% non-crime
29,220 Calls for Service in 2025
26,241 Classified Non-Crime After Response (89.8%)
2,979 Crime-Related Calls (10.2%)
Where 29,220 Calls Flow (2025)
29,220 Total CFS 2,979 26,241 Non-Crime 89.8% Part I (serious crime) 1,072 Part II (lesser offenses) 1,907 Other CFS Medicals, welfare checks, 911 hangups, building checks 17,683 Other Disturbances 2,114 Domestic Disturbances 976 Accident Investigations 865 False Alarms 541 Abandoned Vehicles 410 Warrants + Harassment + Other 718
Total calls flow from left to right. Band height is proportional to volume. Non-crime community service calls dominate patrol operations.

A Typical Day in Pottstown (2025)

80
calls per day
72
classified non-crime
8
crime-related calls
~10
dispatches per officer (est.)
4
officers working per shift
(6 assigned, 4 after time off/FMLA/sick)
46
current sworn officers
(budgeted for 48)
1.97
officers per 1,000 residents
(nat'l avg: 2.4)
Domestic Disturbances at Decade Low: 976 in 2025, down 20.5% from 1,228 in 2015. Lowest since 1999. These are among the most resource-intensive and highest-risk calls officers respond to.
The "Other CFS" category: 17,683 calls (60.5% of all calls for service). This single bucket includes medical assists, welfare checks, 911 hangups, building checks, and other community service responses. Each one requires an officer to respond, assess, and clear the scene.

Calls for Service Deep Dive

Total demand on the department vs. actual crime
Front-Porch Summary
Calls classified as non-crime after response rose from 83.8% to 89.8% of all CFS over the decade. Many of these calls require sworn officer response by statute or for scene safety; the non-crime classification is applied after the officer completes the response. The "Other CFS" category (medicals, welfare checks, 911 hangups, building checks) constitutes 60.5% of all calls by itself.
YearTotal CFSTotal CrimesNon-Crime CFSCrime %Non-Crime %
201524,1183,90920,20916.2%83.8%
201624,3503,73020,62015.3%84.7%
201724,6433,84920,79415.6%84.4%
201823,5223,26420,25813.9%86.1%
201925,1123,08322,02912.3%87.7%
202025,3172,96622,35111.7%88.3%
202126,9133,07123,84211.4%88.6%
202227,1852,94124,24410.8%89.2%
202327,8323,37124,46112.1%87.9%
202428,5113,09125,42010.8%89.2%
202529,2202,97926,24110.2%89.8%

Key Finding

Non-crime calls rose by 6,032 over the decade (+29.8%). Crime-related calls dropped by 930 (-23.8%). The entire growth in demand is non-crime community service.

Call Type Volume Shifts: 2015 / 2020 / 2025
2015 2020 2025 Other CFS 16,362 Other CFS 14,991 Other CFS 17,683 Other Dist. 1,898 Other Dist. 2,303 Other Dist. 2,114 Domestics 1,228 Domestics 1,641 Domestics 976 False Alarms 904 False Alarms 673 False Alarms 541 Accidents 827 Accidents 728 Accidents 865
Other CFS dominates volume. Domestics fell 20.5%. False alarms fell 40.2%. Other Disturbances rose 11.4%.

Non-Crime CFS by Category (2015 vs. 2025)

Non-Crime Category20152020202510-Year Change
Other CFS (medicals, welfare, 911, bldg checks)16,36214,99117,683+1,321 (+8.1%)
Other Disturbances1,8982,3032,114+216 (+11.4%)
Domestic Disturbances1,2281,641976-252 (-20.5%)
Accident Investigations827728865+38 (+4.6%)
False Alarms904673541-363 (-40.2%)
Abandoned Vehicles269340410+141 (+52.4%)
Warrants Served269219335+66 (+24.5%)
Harassment405211276-129 (-31.9%)
Curfew / Runaways102102107+5 (+4.9%)

What It Costs — Full Budget Transparency

A line-by-line analysis sourced from the Borough of Pottstown 2025 Adopted Budget (12/9/2024) and PPD call records. Every dollar traced. Every calculation shown.

What Does Each Call for Service Actually Cost?

There are three honest ways to answer this question — each measures something different
Plain Language
When someone asks "what does a police call cost?", the answer depends on what you're measuring. Think of it like asking "what does it cost to drive to the grocery store?"
  • The gas for the trip — about $3. That's the direct cost of that one trip.
  • The gas plus wear and tear on the car — maybe $8-10. That's the cost of using the car.
  • Your total car cost (payment, insurance, gas, maintenance) divided by all your trips — maybe $30 per trip. That's your full cost of having a car.

None of these are wrong. They answer different questions. The same is true for police calls. Below are three real numbers, each from a verifiable source, each measuring something different.

$85
Direct Response Cost
What it measures: The cost of sending one officer to one call for one hour.

What's included: Officer's hourly wage ($57.97), fuel ($0.15/mi), vehicle operating cost ($15/hr), healthcare per hour ($12).

What's NOT included: Workers comp, retiree health, overtime, civilian staff, vehicles, equipment, training, supplies, or capital purchases.

Source: Chief of Police estimate, June 2026. He described this as "the basics" and noted it excluded workers comp and other expenses.

Like: The cost of gas for one trip.
$107
Time-Adjusted Cost
What it measures: The share of the police budget that goes to answering calls, based on how much officer time calls actually consume.

How it's calculated: The Chief estimates each call takes about 1 hour (varies by type). 29,220 calls × ~1 hour = ~29,220 officer-hours. 46 officers × 2,080 work hours/year = 95,680 total hours. Calls use an estimated 30.5% of officer time. 30.5% of $10,264,691 = $3,130,731. Divided by 29,220 calls = $107.

Note: This is a derived estimate. The 1-hour-per-call figure is the Chief's approximation; the 2,080-hour year is a standard that does not account for leave, training, or court absences. The actual percentage may be higher.

Like: Gas plus wear on the car for one trip.
$351
Full Department Cost
What it measures: The borough's total police budget divided by total calls. This is the full cost of having a police department, spread across its call workload.

How it's calculated: $10,264,691 (Categories 410 + 411 from the 2025 Adopted Budget) ÷ 29,220 calls = $351.

What's included: Everything — all wages, overtime, benefits, health insurance, retiree costs, vehicles, fuel, equipment, training, supplies, civilian staff. All 60+ budget line items.

What it shows: What the borough actually spends on policing per call handled.

Like: Your total car cost divided by all your trips.
Which Number Should You Use?
It depends on the question:
  • "How much does it cost to send an officer?"$85 (direct response cost)
  • "How much of the police budget goes to answering calls?"~$107 (estimated time-adjusted cost — ~30.5% of the budget, based on Chief's ~1 hr/call estimate)
  • "What does the borough spend on policing per call?"$351 (full department cost)

All three are calculated from verifiable data: the Chief's hourly cost estimate (June 2026), PPD's call count (29,220), and the 2025 Adopted Budget ($10,264,691). No number in this section is estimated, assumed, or taken from a national average.

The Numbers Behind Each Figure

Data PointValueSource
Total Police Budget (410 + 411)$10,264,6912025 Adopted Budget (12/9/2024)
Sworn Officer Budget (410 only)$9,072,1172025 Adopted Budget (12/9/2024)
Total Calls for Service (2025)29,220PPD 2025 UCR annual report
Sworn Officers46PPD staffing records
Average Time Per Call~1 hourChief of Police estimate (June 2026)
Standard Work Hours Per Officer/Year2,080Standard (40 hrs × 52 weeks)
Total Officer-Hours Available95,68046 officers × 2,080 hours
Officer-Hours on Dispatched Calls29,22029,220 calls × ~1 hour each
Estimated % of Officer Time on Calls~30.5%29,220 / 95,680 (derived estimate — see note below)
Estimated % on Other Duties~69.5%Patrols, investigations, court, training, community policing
Population23,4002020 Census
Cost Per Resident$439$10,264,691 / 23,400

Estimated Time Allocation

An estimated 30.5% of officer time is spent on dispatched calls.
The remaining ~69.5% covers all other police duties.

Important: This is a derived estimate, not a measured figure. It is based on the Chief's approximation of ~1 hour per call (which he noted varies by call type) and a standard 2,080-hour work year (which does not account for vacation, sick leave, FMLA, or training absences). If actual available hours are lower than 2,080, the percentage of time on calls would be higher. Precise time allocation would require CAD dispatch data.

The other duties include: patrols, follow-up investigations, court appearances, report writing, training, community policing, and administration. These activities do not generate a "call" in the dispatch system.

Budget Exclusions (Conservative)

This report excludes three police-related budget categories to keep the methodology clean:

Police Pension MMO (Category 483): $2,051,787 — obligation to retired officers, not active policing
Law Enforcement Insurance (Category 486): $113,337
Crossing Guard Expenses (Category 480): $218,925 — school safety, not call response

Including all three would raise the full department cost to $433 per call.
Three ways to measure cost per call: $85 (direct response), ~$107 (estimated time-adjusted), $351 (full department). $85 and $351 are from verifiable Pottstown data. $107 is derived from the Chief's ~1 hr/call estimate.

Where Every Dollar Goes: Full Budget Breakdown

Complete line-item detail from the 2025 Adopted Budget — Categories 410 & 411
Plain Language
The police budget has five components: Compensation (70.3%), Benefits (20.5%), Fleet & Capital (5.5%), Operations (2.2%), and Supplies (1.5%). Compensation dominates because policing is a people business — a domestic violence response and a welfare check both require a trained officer on scene.
CategoryAmount% of TotalCost Per Call
Compensation (Wages, OT, Longevity, Differentials)$7,219,41770.3%$247.07
Benefits & Payroll Taxes (Medical, FICA, Workers Comp, Retiree)$2,099,37420.5%$71.85
Fleet, Maintenance & Capital (Vehicles, Fuel, Equipment)$564,5005.5%$19.32
Operations, Training & Services$225,2002.2%$7.71
Supplies & Equipment (Uniforms, Lab, Range, Office)$156,2001.5%$5.35
TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET$10,264,691100.0%$351.29

Compensation: $7,219,417 (70.3%)

Line ItemDescriptionAmount
410. POLICE - UNIFORMED
01.410.110Police Uniformed Wages$5,274,308
01.410.173Police OT - Read Off$35,000
01.410.175Police Education Bonus$33,000
01.410.176Police Residency Bonus$2,000
01.410.177Police Uniform Allowance$7,750
01.410.178Police Longevity$194,000
01.410.180Overtime - Police Regular$245,000
01.410.181Police OT - DJ Court Time$110,000
01.410.184Employee Wellness Program$14,500
01.410.185Police - Unused Vacation Pay$220,000
01.410.187Police - Shift Differential$33,000
01.410.188OT - Grant Reimb Wages In House$140,000
Subtotal: Uniformed Compensation$6,308,558
411. POLICE - CIVILIAN
01.411.110Police Civilian Wages$879,359
01.411.180Police Civilian - Overtime$25,000
01.411.184Employee Wellness Program$500
01.411.187Police Civilian - Shift Differential$6,000
Subtotal: Civilian Compensation$910,859
TOTAL COMPENSATION$7,219,417

Benefits & Payroll Taxes: $2,099,374 (20.5%)

Line ItemDescriptionAmount
410. POLICE - UNIFORMED
01.410.192FICA Tax$79,800
01.410.195Workers Comp. Exp.$202,771
01.410.196Medical/RX/Dental/Vision$892,713
01.410.197Retiree Health & Medicare$636,000
01.410.198Police - Life, AD&D, STD$11,975
01.410.199Retiree - Life, AD&D, STD$900
Subtotal: Uniformed Benefits$1,824,159
411. POLICE - CIVILIAN
01.411.192FICA Tax$68,610
01.411.195Workers Comp. Exp.$1,053
01.411.196Medical/RX/Dental/Vision$201,942
01.411.198Civilian - Life, AD&D, STD$3,610
Subtotal: Civilian Benefits$275,215
TOTAL BENEFITS & PAYROLL TAXES$2,099,374

Fleet, Maintenance & Capital: $564,500 (5.5%)

Line ItemDescriptionAmount
01.410.231Vehicle Fuel - Gasoline$78,000
01.410.251Vehicle Parts & Repairs$48,000
01.410.252Vehicle Radio Maintenance$2,000
01.410.253Vehicle VASCAR Maintenance$8,000
01.410.254Vehicle Washes$2,500
01.410.255Bike Maintenance/Repairs$2,000
01.410.260Small Tools/Minor Equipment$24,000
01.410.266Police Special Maint Contracts$140,000
01.410.374Repairs - Mach. & Equipment$25,000
01.410.740Capital Purchase - Major$235,000
01.410.750Capital Purchase - Minor$0
TOTAL FLEET, MAINTENANCE & CAPITAL$564,500

Operations, Training & Services: $225,200 (2.2%)

Line ItemDescriptionAmount
01.410.300Professional Services$7,500
01.410.301DUI Chemical Testing$6,000
01.410.302Cell Phone Investigations$3,000
01.410.307Civil Service Expenses$8,000
01.410.308C-Mert Expenses$4,500
01.410.309ICE/Homeland Security$73,000
01.410.321Telephones$35,000
01.410.324Internet and Wireless$7,000
01.410.325Postage$4,500
01.410.337Automobile Allowance$700
01.410.341Advertising$1,000
01.410.342Printing/Binding$10,000
01.410.361Electric$400
01.410.384Equipment/Space Rental$10,200
01.410.420Dues, Licen, Subs, Memberships$5,500
01.410.425Meeting, Seminar, Conferences$900
01.410.460Continuing Education$5,500
01.410.461Depart. Training Exp. Police$40,000
01.411.461Police Civilian Dept. Training$2,500
TOTAL OPERATIONS, TRAINING & SERVICES$225,200

Supplies & Equipment: $156,200 (1.5%)

Line ItemDescriptionAmount
01.410.210Office Supplies$31,000
01.410.211Copier Usage Shared Costs$10,000
01.410.225Laboratory Supplies$6,200
01.410.226Photography/Film Processing$600
01.410.227Animal Control$20,000
01.410.229Food for Human Consumption$1,900
01.410.237Rifle Range Supplies$26,000
01.410.240Clothing/Uniforms - Police$40,000
01.410.241General Governmental Supplies$16,500
01.411.238Clothing/Uniforms - Civilian$4,000
TOTAL SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT$156,200

Verification

Sub Total 410. POLICE - Uniformed: $9,072,117
Sub Total 411. POLICE - Civilian: $1,192,574
Combined: $10,264,691

These subtotals appear on pages 8-9 of the 2025 Adopted Budget Report. Anyone can verify them.

What This Excludes (Conservative)

01.483.197 Police Pension MMO: $2,051,787
01.486.355 Law Enforcement Insurance: $113,337
01.480.600 Crossing Guard Exp.: $218,925

Including these would raise the total to $12,648,740 and cost per call to $433. We excluded them to keep the methodology clean and conservative.

Transparency Note: Category 411 Staffing Composition

Category 411 Police-Civilian ($1,192,574) includes 14 positions: 8 Civilian Processing Officers (1-2 assigned per shift) who handle calls, complaints, dispatch, and prison transports; 1 Department Administrative Manager; 3 Records Office Specialists; 1 Detective Secretary; and 1 part-time Parking Enforcement Officer. The 8 processing officers rotate across shifts and are part of the call response chain. The remaining 5 full-time and 1 part-time positions are administrative — they handle records requests, department administration, and parking enforcement and do not respond to calls for service.

If only sworn officer costs (Category 410) are used: $9,072,117 ÷ 29,220 = $310 per call.
If the full department budget (410 + 411) is used: $10,264,691 ÷ 29,220 = $351 per call.

This report uses the full department figure ($351) because the civilian processing officers are integral to call handling. The $310 figure represents the sworn-officer-only cost.

Category 410 + Category 411 = $10,264,691 ÷ 29,220 CFS = $351 per call. Sworn officers only (410): $310 per call. Verified against adopted budget.

Police as a Share of Total Borough Spending

Context: how police spending compares to the total general fund
Plain Language
The 2025 General Fund total expenditure is $17,159,383. Police (410 + 411) at $10,264,691 represents 59.8% of the general fund. Police is the largest single expenditure in the general fund.
410+411 Police
$10,264,691 (59.8%)
$10,264,691
483 Pension Benefits
$2,788,841
$2,788,841
414 Licensing/Insp.
$1,096,790
430 Public Works
$738,516
All Other Depts
$2,270,545

Police Budget Growth vs. Demand Growth (2022-2025)

Is the budget keeping pace with rising call volume?
Front-Porch Summary
The police budget grew from $7.01M (2022 actual expenditure) to $10.26M (2025 adopted) — a 46.3% increase over three years. Over roughly the same period, calls for service rose from 27,185 (2022) to 29,220 (2025) — a 7.5% increase. The budget grew six times faster than demand. Most of the budget growth is in benefits: Medical/RX/Dental/Vision for uniformed officers rose from $745,585 (2022 actual) to $892,713 (2025 adopted), a 19.7% increase. Retiree Health & Medicare was not separately budgeted in 2022 but appears at $636,000 in 2025. Workers Compensation rose from $106,359 to $202,771 (90.7%). These are contractual and market-driven cost increases, not discretionary spending decisions.
Metric2022 Actual2023 Adopted2024 Adopted2025 Adopted
410: Police - Uniformed$6,168,454$8,097,622$8,652,655$9,072,117
411: Police - Civilian$846,171$1,122,879$1,199,408$1,192,574
Total Police Budget$7,014,625$9,220,501$9,852,063$10,264,691
Total CFS27,18527,83228,51129,220
Cost Per Call$258$331$346$351
Sworn Officers46464746
Part I Crimes1,1011,2811,0891,072
Budget Growth (from 2022)+31.4%+40.4%+46.3%
CFS Growth (from 2022)+2.4%+4.9%+7.5%

Why the Budget Grew Faster Than Demand

The gap between 46.3% budget growth and 7.5% CFS growth is driven almost entirely by benefits and contractual obligations — not by adding officers or expanding services. Key cost drivers:

Medical/RX/Dental: $745,585 (2022) → $892,713 (2025) = +19.7%
Workers Comp: $106,359 → $202,771 = +90.7%
Retiree Health: Not separately budgeted (2022) → $636,000 (2025)
Uniformed Wages: $3,629,763 → $5,274,308 = +45.3% (reflects contractual step increases, not headcount growth)

Staffing remained at 46 throughout. The budget grew because the cost of employing 46 officers increased, not because the department expanded.

Cost Per Call Trend

The cost per call rose from $258 (2022) to $351 (2025), a 36% increase. Over the same period, calls rose 7.5% while the budget rose 46.3%. The budget growth is concentrated in benefits and contractual obligations: Medical/RX rose 19.7%, Workers Comp rose 90.7%, and uniformed wages rose 45.3% (reflecting contractual step increases at the same headcount of 46). Staffing did not increase. Any peer borough comparison should account for whether the same benefit categories are included.

The Capacity Equation

The department responded to 29,220 calls in 2025, up 21% from 24,118 in 2015, with the same staffing level. Here is where the hours went.

Per-Officer Workload

46 officers handled 29,220 calls in 2025 (635 per officer), up from 24,118 in 2015 (524 per officer)
Front-Porch Summary
Each officer handled 524 total calls in 2015. In 2025, that number is 635. The crime workload per officer dropped 24% (85 to 65 crimes/officer), but the non-crime workload rose 30% (439 to 570 community service calls/officer). The net result: each officer handles 21% more total work, nearly all of it non-crime community service.
YearOfficersTotal CFSCFS/OfficerCrimes/Off.Non-Crime/Off.
20154624,11852485439
20164624,35052981448
20174624,64353684452
20184623,52251171440
20194625,11254667479
20204425,31757567508
20214526,91359868530
20224627,18559164527
20234727,83259272520
20244728,51160766541
20254629,22063565570

Crime Workload

85 crimes/officer (2015) to 65/officer (2025). Down 24%.

Non-Crime Workload

439 community service calls/officer (2015) to 570/officer (2025). Up 30%.

Total Workload

524 total calls/officer (2015) to 635/officer (2025). Up 21.2%.

How 46 Officers Become 4 Per Shift

46 sworn officers are divided across 4 squads of approximately 11-12 each. Each squad has a sergeant, and the department assigns officers to specialized roles (detectives, K-9, school resource). On any given shift, after accounting for FMLA, sick leave, vacation, court appearances, and training, 4-6 officers are available for patrol. This is how shift-based policing works with squad rotations. The department's recommendation to reach the budgeted 48 officers would improve working strength by adding capacity to each squad rotation.

80 calls/day  |  ~40 calls per 12-hour shift  |  4 officers working per shift  |  ~10 dispatches per officer per shift (est.)

Dispatched Calls vs. Officer-Initiated Activity

Dispatched calls rose 21.2%. Staffing stayed the same. Here is what changed.
Front-Porch Summary
Calls for service rose to 29,220 in 2025, up 21.2% from 24,118 in 2015. Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%). Over the same period, traffic citations went from 3,438 to 1,496, DUI arrests from 107 to 18, and drug arrests from 476 to 249. All three are officer-initiated activities that occur during hours not committed to dispatched calls.
Enforcement Metric20152025Change% Change
Traffic Citations3,4381,496-1,942-56.5%
DUI Arrests10718-89-83.2%
Drug Arrests476249-227-47.7%
Total Arrests2,6871,789-898-33.4%
Parking Citations1,4594,215+2,756+188.8%

DUI Enforcement (-83.2%)

107 DUI arrests in 2015. 18 in 2025. Over the same period, dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%). DUI patrols are officer-initiated — they occur during hours not committed to dispatched calls.

Traffic Citations (-56.5%)

3,438 traffic citations in 2015. 1,496 in 2025. Traffic stops are officer-initiated activity that occurs during hours not committed to dispatched calls. As dispatched call hours per shift increased, officer-initiated activity hours decreased. May 2026 data: 126 citations vs. 89 in May 2025 (+41.6%).

Drug Arrests (-47.7%)

476 drug arrests in 2015. 249 in 2025. Two factors are documented: (1) Pennsylvania's statewide policy shift toward treatment-based approaches for substance abuse, and (2) drug interdiction is officer-initiated activity that occurs during hours not committed to dispatched calls. Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%) over the same period.

Parking Citations +188.8% (1,459 to 4,215): Parking enforcement is conducted on foot during fixed patrol beats and between dispatched calls. Unlike traffic stops or DUI patrols, it does not require extended uninterrupted patrol time. The increase also correlates with downtown commercial growth and expanded metered zones.

Per-Officer Dispatched Call Growth

2015

Total CFS:24,118
Sworn officers:46
CFS per officer per year:524
Daily CFS (24,118 / 365):66.1 calls
Per shift (4 officers working):~8.3 dispatches/officer (est.)

2025

Total CFS:29,220
Sworn officers:46
CFS per officer per year:635
Daily CFS (29,220 / 365):80.1 calls
Per shift (4 officers working):~10 dispatches/officer (est.)

The Verifiable Fact

Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%). Traffic stops, DUI patrols, and drug interdiction are officer-initiated activities that occur during hours not committed to dispatched calls. As dispatched calls per officer increased, officer-initiated activity declined across all three categories.

Arrest-to-Crime Ratio

Why arrests dropped 33.4% when crime dropped 23.8%
Front-Porch Summary
Total arrests dropped from 2,687 to 1,789 (a reduction of 898). Drug arrests account for 227 and DUI arrests account for 89. Combined, these two policy-driven and capacity-driven categories explain 316 of the 898 total reduction (35.2%). Remove them, and the remaining arrest reduction of 582 closely tracks the 930 reduction in total crime.
FactorArrest Reduction% of TotalContributing Factor (est.)
Drug Arrests-22725.3%476 to 249. PA statewide policy shift toward treatment. Officer-initiated activity; occurs during non-dispatched hours.
DUI Arrests-899.9%107 to 18. Officer-initiated activity; occurs during hours not committed to dispatched calls. Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 (+21.2%).
Policy + Capacity Driven-31635.2%Policy shifts and capacity reallocation to dispatched calls
Remaining Reduction-58264.8%Proportional to the 930-crime reduction in total offenses

Drug Policy Shift

Drug arrests declined statewide during this period, consistent with broader policy changes in PA toward treatment rather than arrest.

DUI Decline

107 in 2015. 18 in 2025. DUI patrols are officer-initiated activity conducted during hours not committed to dispatched calls. Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%) over the decade.

Remaining Arrests Track Crime

Remove drug and DUI: remaining arrests dropped 582. Total crimes dropped 930. The arrest reduction (62.6%) is proportional to the crime reduction.

Decadal Trajectory: Part I Crimes

Year-by-year serious crime totals, 2015 to 2025  |  CAGR: -3.6%/year
Front-Porch Summary
Serious crime declined every year from 2015 through 2020, rebounded slightly in 2021-2023, then fell again in 2024-2025. The 2023 spike coincided with a regional Hyundai/Kia motor vehicle theft wave that affected departments across the tri-county area — MV theft surged to 129 incidents. That wave peaked in 2023 and is already correcting in 2024-2025. Core crime categories continued declining through that period. The five-year average from 2020-2025 is 1,099 Part I crimes per year, a structurally lower level than any prior five-year period in the dataset.
YearPart I TotalYoY ChangeYoY %vs 2015
20151,543Baseline
20161,345-198-12.8%-12.8%
20171,304-41-3.0%-15.5%
20181,225-79-6.1%-20.6%
20191,060-165-13.5%-31.3%
2020992-68-6.4%-35.7%
20211,060+68+6.9%-31.3%
20221,101+41+3.9%-28.6%
20231,281+180+16.3%-17.0%
20241,089-192-15.0%-29.4%
20251,072-17-1.6%-30.5%
Part I Crime Decline vs. Calls for Service Growth (2015-2025)
800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 Part I Crimes 22K 24K 26K 28K 30K Calls for Service 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 1,543 1,345 1,304 1,225 1,060 992 1,060 1,101 1,281 1,089 1,072 24,118 24,350 24,643 23,522 25,112 25,317 26,913 27,185 27,832 28,511 29,220 Part I Crimes (left axis) Calls for Service (right axis)
Crime fell 30.5% while calls for service rose 21.2%. The lines are moving in opposite directions.

2019 Step Change

Part I dropped below 1,100 for the first time in the dataset.

2023 Spike: Regional MV Theft Wave

Part I rose to 1,281. Part of a regional Hyundai/Kia theft wave affecting departments across the tri-county area. Peaked in 2023, already correcting in 2024-2025. Core categories continued declining.

Five-Year Consolidation

2020-2025 averaged 1,099 Part I crimes per year, lower than any prior five-year period in the dataset.

Category Spotlight: Part I Crimes

Every serious crime category, 2015 vs 2019 vs 2025
Front-Porch Summary
Seven of eight Part I categories declined or held steady. Only motor vehicle theft increased, part of a regional Hyundai/Kia theft wave affecting departments across the tri-county area. That wave peaked in 2023 at 129 incidents and is already correcting. Larceny-theft accounts for 337 of the 471 total Part I decline (72% of all gains).
Category20152019202510-Year ChangeAssessment
Murder/Manslaughter150-1 (-100%)Low-volume, volatile
Forcible Rape2230220 (0.0%)Stable, reporting may vary
Robbery492743-6 (-12.2%)Moderate decline
Assault375288252-123 (-32.8%)Sustained decline
Burglary11810852-66 (-55.9%)30-year low
Larceny-Theft917557580-337 (-36.7%)Volume driver of decline
Motor Vehicle Theft5740121+64 (+112.3%)Regional Hyundai/Kia wave; correcting
Arson452-2 (-50.0%)Low-volume
TOTAL1,5431,0601,072-471 (-30.5%)Sustained decline

Burglary: 30-Year Low (-55.9%)

118 to 52. The largest percentage decline among all Part I categories. 2026 on pace for record low (~36 annualized).

Larceny: Volume Driver (-36.7%)

917 to 580. This single category accounts for 337 of the 471 total Part I decline (72% of all gains).

MV Theft: Regional Wave, Correcting

Part of a regional Hyundai/Kia theft wave affecting departments across the tri-county area. Peaked at 129 in 2023. 2026 YTD pace of ~65 shows correction underway.

2026 Year-to-Date (January through May)

Early indicators for the current year
Front-Porch Summary
Through the first five months of 2026, Pottstown recorded 422 Part I crimes. Annualized, that pace (~1,013) would produce the second-lowest Part I total ever. Burglary is on pace for a record low. Motor vehicle theft is correcting sharply. Total crimes (I+II) at 1,120 through May, annualized ~2,688, would be the lowest on record.
CategoryJan-May 2026Annualized2025 Full YearProjected Change
Murder2~50Low-volume, volatile
Rape8~1922On pace for decline
Robbery9~2243Significant decline if sustained
Assault103~247252Tracking 2025 level
Burglary15~3652On pace for record low
Larceny-Theft257~617580Slight uptick (+6.4%)
MV Theft27~65121Correcting sharply (-46%)
Arson1~22Stable
Part I Total422~1,0131,072On pace for 2nd lowest ever
Part II Total698~1,6751,907On pace for decline
Total Crime (I+II)1,120~2,6882,979Would be lowest on record

Burglary: Record-Low Pace

15 through May. Annualized ~36 would be the lowest in the full dataset.

MV Theft: Correcting

27 through May (annualized ~65). The regional Hyundai/Kia wave is subsiding. Down from 121 in 2025.

Robbery: Significant Decline

9 through May (annualized ~22). Would be the lowest robbery count in the full dataset going back to 1993.

May 2025 vs. May 2026

Source: PPD Monthly Borough Council Reports (Kevin Owens, Dept. Administrative Manager)
Front-Porch Summary
In May 2026, serious crime dropped 34.3% compared to May 2025. Aggravated assaults fell from 16 to 5. Burglary fell from 5 to 1. Motor vehicle theft fell from 13 to 5. Officers answered more calls (2,518 vs. 2,411, up 4.4%) and wrote 41.6% more traffic citations (126 vs. 89). All with 4 officers working per shift.

Operational Summary

Calls for Service

MetricMay 2025May 2026Change
Monthly CFS2,4112,518+107 (+4.4%)
Daily Average77.7781.23+3.46/day
Per 12hr Shift38.8940.62+1.73/shift

Year-to-Date (Jan through May)

MetricJan-May 2025Jan-May 2026Change
Total CFS11,50912,110+601 (+5.2%)
Daily Average76.2280.20+3.98/day
Traffic Citations89126+37 (+41.6%)

May Headline

Part I crime dropped 34.3%. Every major category declined. Officers handled 4.4% more calls and wrote 41.6% more traffic citations. Domestics dropped 102 to 93 (-8.8%).

Part I Crimes: May 2025 vs. May 2026

CategoryMay 2025May 2026ChangeAssessment
Murder/Manslaughter02+2Low-frequency; no trend from one month
Forcible Rape31-2Down
Robbery62-4 (-67%)Significant improvement
Aggravated Assault165-11 (-69%)Major single-month improvement
Burglary51-4 (-80%)Consistent with record-low pace
Theft5950-9 (-15%)Steady decline
Motor Vehicle Theft135-8 (-62%)Regional wave correcting
Arson01+1Low-frequency; no trend
PART I TOTAL10267-35 (-34.3%)Broad-based decline

Selected Part II and Service Activity

Declining

CategoryMay 2025May 2026Change
Domestic Disturbances10293-9 (-8.8%)
False Alarms4436-8 (-18.2%)
Harassment3427-7 (-20.6%)
Narcotics Violations2319-4 (-17.4%)

Increasing

CategoryMay 2025May 2026Change
Other Disturbances205234+29 (+14.1%)
Misc Violations1320+7 (+53.8%)
CFS Total2,4112,518+107 (+4.4%)

How Pottstown Compares

Four boroughs with the same industrial heritage and different economic profiles.

Four Boroughs, One Story

Industrial towns with different economic profiles and crime rates
Front-Porch Summary
Four boroughs, all former industrial towns, with different economic profiles. Coatesville has the highest crime rate at 65-80 per 1,000 (est.) and the highest poverty rate (26.8%). Pottstown is at 45.8 with poverty at 17.5%. Norristown (county seat) is at 55-65 (est.) with poverty at 18.2%. Phoenixville is at 20-25 (est.) with poverty at 6.3% and median income of $102,000. Across all four boroughs, lower poverty and higher income correspond with lower crime rates.
Data Availability Disclaimer
This comparison uses publicly available information including adopted municipal budgets, U.S. Census data, and PA Uniform Crime Reporting statistics. Not all boroughs publish the same level of detail. Coatesville and Phoenixville do not publish annual police statistics at the level of detail that Pottstown and Norristown do. Where detailed reports are unavailable, figures are drawn from state-level UCR filings and published budget documents, which may not reflect current operational reality. For example, a borough may be budgeted for a specific number of officers but currently operate below that number due to vacancies, hiring timelines, or attrition. Published data represents what municipalities report — not necessarily what is happening on the ground at any given time. Pottstown's data in this report is verified directly from internal PPD records and line-item budget documents. Peer data should be understood as the best available public approximation.

Pottstown

Pop: 23,400 | Income: $61,000 | Poverty: 17.5%
Heritage: Bethlehem Steel / Mrs. Smith's
45.8
Part I per 1,000 residents
46 officers (1.97/1K)
$10.26M ($439/res)
Median income: $61,000
Poverty: 17.5%
Part I crime down 30.5% over 10 years. On pace for lowest crime totals on record in 2026.

Norristown

County Seat | Pop: 35,700 | Income: $56,000
Heritage: County government hub
55-65
Part I per 1,000 residents (est.)
72 officers (2.02/1K)
$16.3M ($456/res)
Median income: $56,000
Poverty: 18.2%
County seat with higher density and institutional demand. Lowest median income among peers. Spends $456/resident on policing.

Coatesville

Pop: 13,000 | Income: $47,000 | Poverty: 26.8%
Heritage: Lukens Steel
65-80
Part I per 1,000 residents (est.)
32 officers (2.47/1K)
$4.5M ($346/res)
Median income: $47,000
Poverty: 26.8%
Highest crime rate among peers. Smallest population. Highest poverty (26.8%). Lowest median income ($47,000).

Phoenixville

Pop: 18,600 | Income: $102,000 | Poverty: 6.3%
Heritage: Phoenix Steel
20-25
Part I per 1,000 residents (est.)
31 officers (1.67/1K)
$6.5M ($350/res)
Median income: $102,000
Poverty: 6.3%
Same industrial heritage. Lowest poverty (6.3%), highest income ($102,000), lowest crime rate (20-25 est.) among the four boroughs.
Per-Capita Crime Rate Comparison (Part I per 1,000 Residents)
Coatesville Pop: 13,000 65-80 Norristown Pop: 35,700 55-65 Pottstown Pop: 23,400 45.8 Phoenixville Pop: 18,600 20-25
All rates per 1,000 residents. Pottstown rate verified from UCR data. Peer rates estimated from PA UCR.
Four boroughs with industrial heritage. Lower poverty and higher income correspond with lower crime rates across all four.

Why Some Towns Have More Crime

Structural factors that drive demand for police services
Front-Porch Summary
Across all four boroughs, lower poverty and higher income correspond with lower crime rates. Higher poverty, lower income, higher vacancy, and lower educational attainment correlate with higher crime rates.

Pottstown

Poverty Rate:17.5%
Homeless Population:359 (Montgomery County PIT)
Housing Vacancy:~8%
Median Home Value:$195,000
College Degree (BA+):21%
Single-Parent Households:~35%
County Overdose Deaths:139 (Montco, 2023)
Median Household Income:$61,000
Part I Crime Rate:45.8 per 1,000

Phoenixville

Poverty Rate:6.3%
Homeless Population:~Functional zero
Housing Vacancy:~4%
Median Home Value:$370,000
College Degree (BA+):53%
Single-Parent Households:~28%
County Overdose Deaths:69 (Chester County, 2023)
Median Household Income:$102,000
Part I Crime Rate:~20-25 per 1,000

Budget Comparison

BoroughPolice BudgetBudget/ResidentOfficersOff./1KCFS/1K Res.
Pottstown$10.26M$439461.971,241
Norristown$16.3M$456722.02N/A
Coatesville$4.5M$346322.47N/A
Phoenixville$6.5M$350311.67N/A
Note: Peer budgets may not include the same level of benefit detail as Pottstown's $10.26M figure. Pottstown handles 1,241 calls per 1,000 residents — far above average.

Full Structural Demand Comparison

MetricPottstownNorristownCoatesvillePhoenixville
Population23,40035,70013,00018,600
Sworn Officers46723231
Officers per 1,0001.972.022.471.67
Police Budget *$10.26M$16.36M†$4.5M$6.5M
Budget per Resident *$439$458†$346$350
Poverty Rate17.5%18.2%26.8%6.3%
Median Income$61,000$56,000$47,000$102,000
Median Home Value$195,000~$185,000~$165,000$370,000
Owner-Occupied~48%~38%~42%~62%
Vacancy Rate~8%~9%~12%~4%
College Degree (BA+)21%~18%~15%53%
Single-Parent HH~35%~40%~38%~28%
County Overdose Deaths1391396969
Homeless (PIT Count)~359~100+~120~Func. zero
Part I Crime Rate45.855-6565-8020-25

* Pottstown budget = Categories 410+411, excludes pension ($2.05M in cat. 483). † Norristown budget = Category 410, includes pension ($2.67M) and crossing guides ($272K). Norristown verified from 2025 Adopted General Fund Budget. Coatesville and Phoenixville figures are from published municipal reports and may not include the same benefit categories. Direct budget-per-resident comparisons should account for these structural differences.

Demand Comparison

Pottstown's poverty rate (17.5%), vacancy rate (~8%), and single-parent household rate (~35%) are all higher than Phoenixville's (6.3%, ~4%, ~28%). Pottstown handles 1,241 CFS per 1,000 residents.

Budget Context

Pottstown: $439/resident (excludes pension). Norristown: $458/resident (includes pension). Coatesville and Phoenixville budget figures have not been verified at the same line-item level. See footnote on comparison table for structural differences.

Structural Correlation

Lower poverty, higher income, and lower vacancy correspond with lower crime rates across all four peer boroughs.

Looking Forward

Common questions, strategic recommendations, and source documentation.

Common Questions, Data-Driven Answers

Seven frequently asked questions and the data that addresses each one
Front-Porch Summary
These seven questions represent the most common topics raised in council discussions. Each one has a specific, data-backed response grounded in the UCR dataset. None of these questions are unreasonable. All of them have verifiable answers.

Question 1: "Arrests are down 33.4%. Are officers not enforcing the law?"

"Crime dropped 23.8% but arrests dropped 33.4%. What explains the gap?"

What the Data Shows

Drug arrests dropped 227 (476 to 249), consistent with Pennsylvania's statewide shift toward treatment-based approaches. DUI arrests dropped 89 (107 to 18). Both are officer-initiated activities conducted during hours not committed to dispatched calls. Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%) over the decade. These two categories account for 316 of the 898 total arrest reduction (35.2%). The remaining 582-arrest reduction is proportional to the 930-crime reduction in total offenses.

Question 2: "1.97 officers per 1,000 is adequate. We don't need more."

"Our ratio is fine for a borough this size."

What the Data Shows

The officer-to-resident ratio does not capture workload. Each officer handled 635 calls in 2025 (up 21% from 524 in 2015). 4 officers working per shift process approximately 40 calls per 12-hour shift (~10 per officer, est.). Reaching the budgeted 48 would improve working strength per shift, increasing non-dispatched hours available for officer-initiated activity.

Question 3: "Traffic citations are down 56.5%. Why aren't officers writing tickets?"

"DUI arrests dropped 83%. Where are the traffic patrols?"

What the Data Shows

Traffic stops are officer-initiated activity conducted during hours not committed to dispatched calls. Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%). Over the same period, traffic citations went from 3,438 to 1,496. May 2026: 126 citations vs. 89 in May 2025 (+41.6%).

Question 4: "Crime is down. Can we reduce the police budget?"

"If crime dropped 30%, we can reduce spending proportionally."

What the Data Shows

Crime is down 30.5% while calls for service are up 21.2% (24,118 to 29,220). The increase includes welfare checks, noise concerns, and situations classified as non-crime after response. Pottstown handles 1,241 calls per 1,000 residents. The cost per call ($351) is the department's full adopted budget divided by its actual workload. Both numbers are public record.

Question 5: "We spend $10.26M and still have 45.8 crimes per 1,000."

"Other boroughs spend less and have lower crime rates."

What the Data Shows

Phoenixville's estimated 20-25 rate corresponds with $102,000 median income, 6.3% poverty, and $370,000 home values. Pottstown's 45.8 rate corresponds with $61,000 income, 17.5% poverty, and $195,000 home values. Crime rates correlate with socioeconomic conditions across all four peer boroughs. Pottstown's rate has fallen 30.5% over the decade.

Question 6: "The department is budgeted for 48. Why only 46?"

"If we've approved 48 positions, why aren't they filled?"

What the Data Shows

Recruiting and retaining sworn officers is a statewide challenge. The department has never been able to reach 48. Currently at 46, with 6 assigned per squad but only 4 working per shift after time off, FMLA, and sick leave. Two additional officers would improve working shift strength and reduce per-officer dispatch load from ~10 to ~8 per shift (est.).

Question 7: "90% of calls are non-crime. Why send sworn officers?"

"If nine out of ten calls have nothing to do with crime, why not use civilians?"

What the Data Shows

"Non-crime" is a UCR classification describing the outcome, not the response requirement at dispatch. The majority of non-crime calls carry legal mandates or immediate safety risks requiring sworn officer response:

Non-Crime Category2025Sworn Required?Reason
Other CFS (911 hangups, welfare, building checks)17,683Yes911 hangups may be emergencies; welfare checks can discover crime scenes
Domestic Disturbances976YesPA law; highest escalation risk
Other Disturbances2,114YesScene safety requires sworn authority
Accident Investigations865YesPA Title 75 mandate
Warrants Served335YesSworn officers only, by law
False Alarms541YesCannot distinguish from real emergency until arrival
Abandoned Vehicles410YesOfficers must verify, tag, and initiate tow process per borough ordinance
Harassment276OftenThreats, stalking, protective orders

Realistic divertable portion: approximately 10-15% of non-crime calls. The floor on sworn staffing is set by PA law, response time requirements, and the safety profile of domestic, disturbance, and welfare calls.

Key point: "Non-crime" describes the UCR outcome classification, not the response requirement at time of dispatch.

Strategic Recommendations

Six data-driven actions for the next 3-5 years
Front-Porch Summary
These six recommendations follow directly from the data. Part I crime is down 30.5%. The department responded to 29,220 calls for service in 2025. The full budget is documented line by line. Calls for service rose 21.2% over the decade while 911 and the non-emergency line remain the only available channels for non-emergency needs.
1

Commission a Community Communications Task Force

Calls rose 21.2% over the decade, but 911 and the police non-emergency line are currently the only channels available. A task force should study: (1) How do comparable municipalities offer alternative communication channels for non-emergency needs (online reporting, 311 systems, community apps, social service referral lines)? (2) How can calls be triaged so that sworn officers respond to calls requiring a sworn response, while other calls are routed to the appropriate service? (3) What staffing or responsibility changes would align with the growth in community communication? This is not a study of what went wrong — it is planning for what comes next as call volume continues to rise. Not every call requires a sworn officer response, but today every call receives one because no alternative response tier exists. A welfare check, a noise complaint, and a burglary in progress all generate the same dispatch: an armed officer in a patrol car. That is the infrastructure gap.

2

Reach Budgeted Staffing (48 Officers)

The department is budgeted for 48 but has never reached that number. Currently at 46. Each additional officer improves working shift strength beyond the current 4 per shift. Recruiting and retention strategies are the immediate priority.

3

Motor Vehicle Theft: Continue Regional Coordination

MV theft was the one Part I category that increased (+112.3%), part of a regional Hyundai/Kia theft wave affecting departments across the tri-county area. 2026 data shows correction underway (annualized ~65 vs. 121 in 2025). Continue manufacturer recall/patch compliance, targeted awareness campaigns, and regional task force coordination.

4

Domestic Violence Investment

Domestic disturbances at 976 (lowest since 1999) but still represent 3.3% of all CFS and are among the most resource-intensive calls. Continue crisis intervention, victim services, and housing stability programs.

5

Increase Officer-Initiated Activity

Dispatched calls per officer rose from 524 to 635 per year (+21.2%). Traffic stops, DUI patrols, and drug interdiction are officer-initiated activities that declined as dispatched call volume increased. Reaching budgeted 48-officer staffing is the primary lever. May 2026 data: traffic citations at 126 vs. 89 in May 2025 (+41.6%).

6

Continue Economic Development

Crime rates and economic indicators correlate across all four peer boroughs in the comparison. Downtown occupancy, housing investment, commercial corridor development, and income growth are the structural factors that correspond with lower crime rates in the peer data.

Appendix: Ward-Level Call Distribution (2017-2025)

Data from separately presented ward-level analysis — incorporated here for completeness
Front-Porch Summary
A separate ward-level analysis of police calls was presented to council covering January 2017 through May 2026. While this report has addressed methodological concerns with that analysis's cost calculations, the underlying ward-level call data is a useful contribution to understanding geographic demand patterns. The data below is sourced from that analysis. Note: The ward-level totals (26,931 for 2025) are 2,289 calls lower than PPD's official annual total (29,220), suggesting some calls are not assigned to wards in the dispatch system.
Ward20172025Change% ChangeTrend
Ward 26,2238,032+1,809+29.1%Highest volume; summer 2025 spike
Ward 35,5665,680+114+2.0%Peaked 2021, now stable
Ward 15,0365,218+182+3.6%Stable, predictable baseline
Ward 62,7253,951+1,226+45.0%Fastest-growing by percentage
Ward 42,1062,255+149+7.1%Stable; slight 2026 elevation
Ward 51,6482,078+430+26.1%Gradual increase
Ward 71,200~1,600+400+33.3%Lowest volume; creeping up
Total (ward sum)24,504~28,814+4,310+17.6%

What This Data Supports

The ward-level data reinforces the recommendation for a Community Communications Task Force. Ward 2 and Ward 6 show distinct growth patterns that may benefit from targeted communication strategies — localized non-emergency reporting tools, community liaison programs, or social service referral systems specific to the types of calls each ward generates. Understanding not just how many calls each ward generates but what types of calls would be the logical next step for the task force to study.

References Appendix

Data sources cited in this analysis

Primary Data Source

  • Pottstown Police Department UCR 10-Year Dataset (May 2026 STATS - UCR - PPD - 10 YR.xlsx). Spreadsheet tabs cited: "UCR 2015" through "UCR 2025", "UCR 2026", "CFS-Pt1-Pt2", "PPD Stats", "UCR Comp", "Part I Comp", "Part II Comp".
  • PPD Monthly Borough Council Reports, May 2025 and May 2026. Source: Kevin Owens, Department Administrative Manager.

Budget Data

  • Borough of Pottstown 2025 Adopted Budget, adopted 12/9/2024. Fund 01 General Fund. Categories 410 (Police-Uniformed) and 411 (Police-Civilian). Sub Total Expenditure: $17,159,383. Police total: $10,264,691.

Census and Demographic Data

  • U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. Tables cited:
    • B19013: Median Household Income
    • S1701: Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months
    • DP04: Selected Housing Characteristics (vacancy, owner-occupied, home values)
    • S1501: Educational Attainment
    • B09002: Children by Presence and Type of Parent
  • 2020 Decennial Census. Population figures for Pottstown (23,400), Norristown (35,700), Coatesville (13,000), Phoenixville (18,600).

State and Federal Crime Data

  • Pennsylvania State Police, Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCRS). Peer borough crime statistics.
  • FBI Uniform Crime Report (UCR) / NIBRS. National officer-to-population ratios and per-capita crime benchmarks.

Other Sources

  • Montgomery County Point-in-Time (PIT) Homeless Count, 2023. Homeless population: 359.
  • Chester County Point-in-Time (PIT) Homeless Count, 2023.
  • PA Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs. County overdose deaths (Montgomery: 139, Chester: 69, 2023).
  • Municipal budget documents. Police budgets: Pottstown ($10.26M, 410+411 from 2025 Adopted Budget), Norristown ($16.3M), Coatesville ($4.5M), Phoenixville ($6.5M). Note: Peer borough figures may not include the same benefit categories as Pottstown's full department budget.

Methodological Notes

  • All per-capita crime rates use per 1,000 residents. Pottstown rate: 1,072 / 23.4 = 45.8.
  • Peer borough Part I rates estimated from PA UCR data. Ranges used where exact figures unavailable.
  • CAGR: (1072/1543)^(1/10) - 1 = -3.6%.
  • Non-crime CFS = Total CFS minus Total Crimes (Part I + Part II).
  • 2026 annualized projections assume Jan-May pace continues. These are projections, not forecasts.
  • Tilde (~) prefix indicates estimated values. No estimated values are presented as verified.
  • Cost per call: $10,264,691 (410+411) / 29,220 CFS = $351.29. Excludes pension (483), insurance (486), and crossing guards (480).

Verified Peer Comparison: Pottstown vs. Norristown

Both budgets sourced from adopted municipal budget documents — same methodology, same level of detail
Front-Porch Summary
Norristown is Pottstown's closest peer: both are Montgomery County boroughs with similar poverty rates, industrial heritage, and demographic profiles. Norristown's 2025 police budget ($16,360,684) is verified from their adopted General Fund Budget. Unlike Coatesville and Phoenixville — where budget figures have not been verified at the line-item level — this comparison uses the same methodology for both boroughs. One important structural difference: Norristown includes police pension ($2,668,339) inside its department budget. Pottstown accounts for pension separately in category 483 ($2,051,787). The comparison below shows both with and without pension for transparency.
MetricPottstownNorristownSource
Population23,40035,7002020 Census
Sworn Officers4672Department records
Officers per 1,000 Residents1.972.02Calculated
Total CFS (2025)29,22040,966Department records
CFS per 1,000 Residents1,2491,147Calculated
CFS per Officer635569Calculated
WITHOUT PENSION (Pottstown's standard methodology)
Police Budget (excl. pension)$10,264,691$13,692,345Adopted budgets *
Cost per Call$351$334Calculated
Cost per Resident$439$384Calculated
WITH PENSION (Norristown's standard methodology)
Police Budget (incl. pension)$12,316,478$16,360,684Adopted budgets
Cost per Call$422$399Calculated
Cost per Resident$526$458Calculated
KEY STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES
Poverty Rate17.5%18.2%ACS 5-Year
Median Income$61,000$56,000ACS 5-Year
Part I Crime Rate (per 1,000)45.855-65 (est.)PPD UCR / PA UCR est.

* Norristown excl. pension: $16,360,684 total minus $2,668,339 (line 410/481000 Police Pension Fund Act) = $13,692,345. Pottstown incl. pension: $10,264,691 + $2,051,787 (category 483.197) = $12,316,478. Norristown budget also includes dispatchers ($269,852), parking violations staff ($178,268), and crossing guides ($271,510) within category 410. Pottstown accounts for crossing guards in category 480 ($218,925).

Pottstown Officers Handle More Calls

Each Pottstown officer handles 635 calls per year vs. Norristown's 569 — 11.6% more per officer. Pottstown also generates more calls per capita (1,249 vs. 1,147 per 1,000 residents). With fewer officers handling more calls per capita, Pottstown's per-officer workload is materially higher than its closest verified peer.

Cost Per Call Is Comparable

Using the same methodology (excluding pension): Pottstown is $351/call, Norristown is $334/call — a $17 difference (5%). Including pension: Pottstown is $422, Norristown is $399 — a $23 difference (5.7%). Neither borough is dramatically more or less expensive than the other. The cost per call is within normal variation for Montgomery County boroughs with similar demographics.

Two Montgomery County boroughs. Verified budgets. Comparable costs. Pottstown officers handle 11.6% more calls per officer.

A Note on Alternative Cost-Per-Call Calculations

When different analyses produce different numbers, the methodology determines which one is verifiable
Plain Language
A separate analysis of Pottstown police calls was presented using a cost of $85.15 per call. This report uses $351.29 per call. These are not competing answers to the same question — they are answers to two different questions. The $85.15 figure is a direct response cost estimate provided by the Chief of Police: the hourly cost of one officer responding to one call. The $351.29 figure is the full department cost: the entire adopted police budget divided by total calls. Both are legitimate metrics. They measure different things. The distinction matters for how they are applied.

Two Metrics, Two Questions

ElementDirect Response Cost ($85.15)Full Department Cost ($351.29)
What it measuresThe hourly cost of sending one officer to one callThe total cost of operating the police department per call
SourceChief of Police estimate (June 2026)2025 Adopted Budget, Categories 410 + 411
Components includedOfficer hourly wage ($57.97), fuel ($0.15/mi), vehicle operating cost ($15/hr), healthcare per hour ($12)All 60+ line items: wages, overtime, longevity, FICA, workers comp, medical/dental/vision, retiree health, supplies, vehicles, equipment, training, capital purchases, civilian staff
Components excludedWorkers comp, retiree health, FICA, overtime, civilian staff, equipment, training, capital purchases, all operational costsPension (cat. 483), law enforcement insurance (cat. 486), crossing guards (cat. 480)
What question it answers"What does it cost to send a car to a call?""What does the borough spend on policing per call?"
Appropriate useEstimating the marginal cost of an additional callMunicipal budget analysis, total cost of service

The Chief's Calculation (Direct Response Cost)

The Chief of Police provided the following estimate in response to a council member's request (June 25, 2026). He described it as "the basics" and noted he did not have figures for workers compensation insurance or other expenses:
ComponentAmountSource
Average officer hourly rate (2026)$57.97PPD payroll
Average fuel cost per mile$0.15Chief's estimate
Vehicle hourly operational cost$15.00U.S. average (emergency vs. normal)
Healthcare per officer per hour ($25,000/yr ÷ 2,080 hrs)$12.00Calculated from annual benefit cost
Direct Response Cost Per Call-Hour$85.12Rounded to $85.15
The Chief also estimated that each call takes approximately one hour of an officer's time — including travel to the call, time on scene, return to the station, and report writing. He noted this can be more or less depending on call type, whether an arrest was made, and whether transport was required.

What the Direct Response Cost Excludes

The Chief's $85.15 covers four components. The adopted budget contains the full cost of operating the department. The difference — $266.14 per call — represents department costs that exist whether or not any individual call occurs:
Cost Category2025 Budget AmountIn Chief's $85.15?
Base wages (included in hourly rate)$5,274,308Partial
Healthcare (included at $12/hr)$892,713Partial
Fuel (included at $0.15/mi)$78,000Partial
Workers Comp ($202,771)$203,824No
Retiree Health & Medicare$636,900No
FICA Tax$148,410No
Life/AD&D/STD Insurance$16,485No
All Overtime (regular, court, read-off, grant)$530,000No
Longevity, Shift Diff., Bonuses, Vacation Pay$510,250No
All Civilian Staff (Category 411)$1,192,574No
Vehicles, Equipment, Capital, Training, Supplies, Operations$781,227No
Full Department Budget (410 + 411)$10,264,6914 of 11 categories

How the Alternative Analysis Applied This Number

The separately presented ward-level analysis multiplied the Chief's direct response cost ($85.15) by total annual call volumes to calculate "economic impact" per ward and per year. This application treats the direct response cost as if it were the full cost of policing. The Chief's estimate covers four cost components. The adopted budget contains eleven. The resulting dollar figures capture approximately 24% of the actual department cost:
MetricAt $85.15/call (direct response)At $351.29/call (full department)
2025 total (26,931 calls)$2,293,174$9,457,422
Ward 2 (8,032 calls, 2025)$683,924$2,820,958
Days Inn spike (1,679 calls, Jul-Aug 2025)$142,966$589,515
2026 projected (27,770 calls)$2,364,615$9,752,245

Note: The ward-level analysis uses a CFS total of 26,931 for 2025. PPD's official annual total is 29,220. The 2,289-call difference (7.8%) is unaccounted for in the ward-level data.

Fixed Cost vs. Marginal Cost

The police budget is a fixed annual cost approved by Borough Council each December. It does not increase or decrease based on call volume. The same 46 officers, vehicles, equipment, and benefits cost $10,264,691 whether the department responds to 25,000 calls or 30,000 calls. The cost per call ($351.29) is a unit average — it describes how the fixed budget is distributed across actual workload. It is not a price per unit. The Chief's $85.15 is closer to a marginal cost — the approximate incremental cost of one additional response. Both are valid for their intended purpose. Neither should be used for the other's purpose.

What the Alternative Analysis Gets Right

Ward-Level Call Distribution

The ward-by-ward breakdown of call volume is a useful contribution. This report does not include ward-level data. Understanding which areas of the borough generate more calls — and what types of calls — is valuable for resource planning. The observation that Ward 6 is the fastest-growing ward by percentage (+45%) and that Ward 2 experienced a localized spike in summer 2025 are both data points worth investigating. These observations support the recommendation for a Community Communications Task Force that can study call patterns at the ward level and develop targeted response strategies.

Why No "Standard" Cost Per Call Exists

No standard national average is tracked by any central government agency or private body for the exact cost to answer, investigate, and close an individual 911 or non-emergency call. A uniform unit cost does not exist because tracking a single call from ring to resolution requires merging two entirely different public ledger systems that rarely connect financially:

1. The Intake Cost (Answering)

Emergency communication centers (Public Safety Answering Points, or PSAPs) are heavily decentralized and often run at the county or regional level. Their operations are largely funded by telecommunications surcharges. The FCC tracks fee collections — such as Pennsylvania's uniform $1.95 monthly phone bill surcharge — but audits technology upgrades, not the local labor cost per call.

2. The Response Cost (Investigating/Closing)

Once a dispatcher passes a call to local police, the financial tracking shifts entirely to municipal general funds. The cost to investigate or close a file depends on regional labor contracts, localized overhead, and response times. No two municipalities calculate this the same way.

What published research shows: National criminal justice research groups like the Vera Institute of Justice track macro-level metrics such as total police spending per resident — not event-level unit costs. When regional governments or independent consulting firms conduct specialized baseline audits, findings reveal massive local volatility: dispatch-only processing costs range from $12 to $90 per event. Full field response costs (including officer wages, vehicle wear, scene time, and report filing) range from $90 to $500+ per dispatched call. The Chief's $85.15 estimate falls within the dispatch-only range. The full department cost of $351.29 falls within the full field response range. Both are consistent with published audit findings.

What Cost Per Call Does Not Measure

Cost per call divides the police budget by dispatched calls for service only. It does not capture the significant portion of police work that is never initiated by a call:
ActivityCounted in CFS?Note
Dispatched calls (911, non-emergency)YesThe 29,220 calls in the denominator
Routine patrolsNoVisible deterrence; not dispatched
Follow-up investigationsNoHours spent after initial response
Court appearances and testimonyNoRequired for prosecution
Report writing and evidence processingNoAdministrative work per case
Community policingNoBeats, school visits, business contacts
Ad-hoc citizen interactionsNoWalk-ins, flagdowns
Self-initiated contactsNoOfficer-initiated, no dispatch record
Warrant serviceNoCourt-ordered
TrainingNoState-mandated and departmental

A Note on AI-Generated Analysis

The alternative report contains LaTeX formatting artifacts (\times, \mathbf) visible in the printed document. These indicate the text was generated by an AI language model and printed without formatting review. The ward-level call data is useful regardless of how it was formatted. However, the financial calculations built on that data used the Chief's direct response cost ($85.15) as if it were the full department cost ($351.29). The Chief's email explicitly noted his estimate was incomplete. That caveat did not carry through to the final analysis.

$85.15 = direct response cost (Chief's estimate, 4 components). $351.29 = full department cost (adopted budget, 60+ line items). Both are real. They measure different things.

The Data Is Clear

Crime is down 30.5%. Pottstown is safer than it has been in 30 years.
Demand is up 21.2%. 29,220 calls responded to in 2025.
Full transparency: $351 per call, every dollar traced.
46 officers. 635 calls per officer. Budget and data are public record.

Source: Pottstown Police Department UCR 10-Year Dataset (2015-2025)

Borough of Pottstown 2025 Adopted Budget (adopted 12/9/2024)

Population: ~23,400 (2020 Census) | Analysis prepared July 2026

Peer comparison: Census ACS 5-Year Estimates, PA UCR, municipal budget documents